The Montlake Flyer

A newsletter for the entire Montlake community

Volume 34, Number 7                                                                                                        September 2000


Text Box: Inside  
President’s Message
Board Meeting Minutes (Jun & Aug)
General Meeting Minutes
Montlake Community Center
CUCAC Report
NEDC, Husky Stadium Congestion
Revised Stadium Game Schedule
Letter to the Editor
Text Box: Community Club Meeting
When:	Wednesday, September 13, 2000
7:30 p.m.
Where:	Montlake Community Center
1618 Calhoun Street
Agenda
7:30:	Introductory remarks, approval of minutes, and old business.
7:45	Montlake Public Library siting update.
8:15	UW campus master planning issues.
8:40	Neighborhood-based disaster preparedness.
9:00	New Business.
9:15	Adjournment.
Update on the Siting of the New Montlake Library

By Ellen Judson

As all who have been following these pages know, a new 5,000-square-foot library to replace the existing Montlake Library is in the planning stages. A library liaison committee was formed last spring and this dedicated group (Montlakers Lyle Bick­nell, Jonathan Dubman, Laura Gard­ner, Ellen Judson, Lee Kolb, Susan Powers and Bob New­house) worked with Sue Partridge, project manag­er for the new library, to identify potential sites. With input from several Community Club meet­ings, the liaison commit­tee focused on 18 poten­tial sites. After careful analysis, eight sites were chosen and presented at a community-wide meeting June 20 at Montlake School. The Library Board narrowed this selection to three sites at their July 25 meeting:

·        24th Ave. E./ E. McGraw St. – N.E. corner (two properties on 24th and one on McGraw).

·        Montlake Professional Building – 24th Ave. E., between E. Lynn & E. Boston Sts. (possible structured parking).

·        MOHAI.

All siting is based on a ground-level library, with some exploration of locating other uses above. The Library Board met Tuesday, August 22 for further discussion.

The Library Liaison Committee will lead an update of the siting process at the next MCC general meeting on September 13, with Sue Partridge present to listen to the discussion and to answer questions.

I encourage all to voice their ideas. The Library has shown a keen interest in eliciting response from Montlake. The new Montlake Library will be an exciting addition to our neighborhood. Finding the right location is an important action and will contri­bute to the sense of this community for many years to come!

Avenues of response, in addition to the September MCC meeting, are:

Sue Partridge, AIA, Senior Capital Projects Manager, Seattle Public Library
Phone:      (206) 615-1329
Email: Sue.Partridge@spl.org.

Seattle Public Library website www.spl.org/ neighborhoodlibs/montlake or via a link from http:// montlake.net. Email comments to capital.projects @spl.org.

Comment forms are also available at the Montlake Library. All comments are passed to the Library Board. To be added to the mailing list for library announcements, send your address to caroline. ullmann@spl.org. Ellen Judson can be reached at ejudson@araijackson.com or at (206) 322-7641.

Trans-Lake Washington Project Begins Anew

By Jean Leed

Last June the Trans-Lake Washington Project (TLWP) began again. I have been appointed by the Montlake Community Club to represent our neighborhood on the advisory committee. That committee will meet monthly for the next nine months (on the same day as the MCC meeting, so come to the meetings for the latest update). Separate tech­nical and executive committees have also been constituted. All three committees will coordinate their work, which presently focuses on developing the scope for an environmental impact study on the var­ious alternatives recom­mended by the original Trans-Lake Washington Study Committee during 1998-99.

In mid-July, TLWP held three public meetings to get community input. At the meeting held at MOHAI, Bruce Balick (immediate past MCC president) and Clarissa Easton (current president) reiterated MCC’s guidelines for SR 520, which the membership affirmed at the February general meeting, and MCC’s desire to be actively involved in developing and evaluating proposals throughout the process.

Clarissa is chairing the MCC Transportation Com­mittee, which has some 10 members and always welcomes additional interested Montlakers. Contact Clarissa for meeting times. This committee will be our primary forum for discussion of progress during the TLWP, as well as other transportation-related issues in our community. For further information, phone Jean Leed at 206-329-9208 or email jeanleed@pipeline.com.

 

President’s Comments

What a grand and glorious summer! Hope you were able to attend the jointly-sponsored “We Celebrate You” at the Montlake Community Center. If not, remember that the Montlake Community Club, the Montlake Advisory Council, and the Montlake Community Center intend the picnic for neighbors, friends, and families to be an annual event. We have had some great suggestions for meetings: potluck supper before the general meetings, babysitting training for neighborhood preteens, a CPR class, and school selection discussions. Are there any “senior” issues out there we could offer forums on? Please call me with your ideas.

Please remember that Bruce Balick is our liaison to the Seahawks and City of Seattle during the football season. He needs to hear comments and compliments regarding the team’s use of Husky stadium and its impact on the Montlake neighborhood. Likewise, Ellen Judson would like to hear from you regarding the future siting of the new Montlake Public Library. 

In attempting to get the MCC Transportation Committee up and running, I am chairing the group for the short term. However, I am pleased to have several residents who have pledged their time and energy to this issue. Please check the Montlake Community Club website for updates on the follow-on work underway on the Trans-Lake Study. If you want to speak with us directly, please join one of the upcoming Transportation Committee meetings. We are trying something different this fall. Our meetings will be the first Wednesday of the month at 6:00 pm at Grady’s Pub. MCC Board of Trustees meetings will be held afterward at 7:30 pm at Paul Gibson’s house. The next pair of meetings (Transportation and Trustees) is Wednesday, September 6. 

 

--Clarissa Easton

 

 

Board Meeting Minutes

June 7, 2000 The Board of Trustees of the Montlake Community Club convened at 7:35 p.m. on June 7, 2000, at 1718 26th Ave. E., the home of Paul and Beth Gibson, with president Clarissa Easton presiding. Members Burgett, DeBurle, Gibson, Hutchinson, Jacobson, Judson, Leed, and Kolb were present. Minutes of the previous meeting were approved with the correction of address of the previous meeting.

Following a review of expenditures for last year, Lee Kolb proposed adoption of the following budget for routine expenses:

·        Newsletter printing: $8,500.

·        Beautification Committee: $500 (from Beautification account).

·        Liability Insurance: $400.

·        Annual corporation filing: $10.

·        Dues; SCCF and SCAA: $200.

·        Meeting room registration: $30.

Mail expenses (postage, supplies, mail box rent): $300.

At the suggestion of Jean Leed, the newsletter printing budget was increased to $9,000 to permit abbreviated summer issues. With this change, the budget was approved by the board.

As part of the budget discussion, Lee Kolb was asked to examine the minutes of previous meetings to determine what amount had been authorized for the appeal of the City's approval of the University Community Urban Center Plan. Also, Scott Burgett affirmed that the MCC Education Fund balance had been donated to a PTSA fund for repainting the school’s exterior trim, at the desire of the school principal. Scott asked what the plans were for the balance of $2,432 remaining in the MCC Tot Lot Fund. The board decided to use the newsletter to let the community know that this fund was available for other projects of a similar nature.

President Easton reminded the board of the City Council hearing on June 8 to take public comment on the proposed city levy for parks and community centers. She suggested that anyone wishing to speak at the hearing contact the Montlake Advisory Council, which will be trying to coordinate community presentations. She also suggested that board members send comments directly to Council members.

Paul Gibson reported that the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the new Arboretum Master Plan has been published and that a public hearing was scheduled for June 15. He said that the DEIS concludes that the Plan has no adverse environmental impacts, but he hopes that the public comments will argue that there will be significant aesthetic impacts if the construction plans are permitted. In response to a question about the future course of the planning process, he said that the Department of Parks and Recreation will probably prepare the final EIS by listing the comments received at the hearing and responding to them. They will send the final EIS to the City Council along with their recommendations on alternatives, then the Council will have another public hearing before taking final action. In response to another question, he said that the DEIS did not specifically address the future of the building presently housing the Museum of History and Industry.

President Easton next introduced a request from the Arboretum Park Preservation Coalition (APPC) for a donation to help pay for preparation of a petition to obtain Landmark status for Washington Park. The text of the request argued that a positive recommendation from the Seattle Landmarks Preservation Board would encourage the City Council to look more critically at the alterations to the Arboretum and Washington Park that are proposed in the DEIS. Board members had a number of questions about this approach, such as what specific protections does landmark status afford, what is the probability of a positive recommendation from the Landmarks Preserva­tion Board, and what is the time required for achieving a decision on landmark status. No one present had definite answers, so the board decided to take no action on the donation request and to attempt to recruit some know­ledgeable person or persons to speak at the coming general meeting.

Jean Leed reported that she had been asked by the City of Seattle for permission to nominate her for the Citizen Advisory Group that is to assist in preparation of the DEIS for the Trans-Lake Washington Study, and that she wanted to consult with the MCC board before agreeing, since her nomination to the initial Study team had been made by the MCC. President Easton said that she had been contacted by other neighborhoods regarding the Advisory Group nomination process, and that these neigh­borhoods had been asked to submit nominees, whereas Montlake had not. She expressed concern that Jean’s acceptance as a City nominee rather than as a nominee of the MCC might leave Montlake with no neighborhood advocate, and asked for time to discuss with the City how they are selecting their representatives to the Advisory Group before proceeding.

Paul Gibson mentioned that the Trans-Lake Washington Ferry Project Advisory Committee, on which Doug Woods represented Montlake, had published the results of its feasibility study. The route examined was between Kirkland and the University of Washington, with potential expansion to South Lake Union. Two meetings, one in the University District on June 12 and one in Kirkland on June 14, were scheduled to provide the public with information on the proposal and to take public comment.

The next meeting of the board was scheduled for the first Wednesday in August at the same location (the Gibson residence), although President Easton indicated that she may need to call an earlier meeting if the June general meeting leaves some issues unresolved.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m.

August 9, 2000 The Board of Trustees of the Montlake Community Club convened at 7:45 p.m. on August 9, 2000, at the Montlake Community Center, with president Clarissa Easton presiding. Members Burgett, DeBurle, Doran, Hutchinson, Jacobson, Judson, Kolb, Leed, and Thompson and past-president Balick were present.

President Easton informed the board that the Montlake Advisory Council (MAC) had invited the club to cospon­sor the annual Family Day at the Montlake Community Center. The MAC suggested that the club pay the $300 cost of providing two professional clowns for the event. In the ensuing discussion, there was general support for club participation, but some reluctance to be identified as cosponsor or to make a significant contribution unless the community was invited to participate by some means more effective than the posters that had been used in the past. Lee Kolb moved that the club donate $200 toward entertainment expenses and, with MAC approval, prepare and distribute an invitation to the event throughout the community. After a short discussion, the motion was passed, with President Easton volunteering to see to preparation of the notice and Lee Kolb responsible for distribution.

President Easton reminded the board that the deadline for the September newsletter was Friday, August 11.

The next subject for discussion was an initiative by the University of Washington to have its statutory limit on leased off-campus building space either raised or elimi­nated. According to President Easton, the University had made their intention known through a presentation to the Northeast District Council last week. She, along with the presidents of other community councils in the area, had been invited to meet with UW Vice President Ihrig in the near future to learn more about the proposal. It was the general opinion of the board that it was premature to take up the issue at a club meeting until more information becomes available.

Lee Kolb reported that the change in the University's lease lid had been the subject of some discussion at the CUCAC meeting the previous evening. Another item of interest at the CUCAC meeting was the University's plan to moder­nize their golf driving range with a two-level clubhouse, improved lighting and 100-foot fencing. The University has also issued the draft environmental impact statement for the Surgery Pavilion, a three-story structure with three floors of underground parking, just west of Montlake Boulevard and east of the hospital. All of these issues require community response via CUCAC representatives.

Ellen Judson provided an update on site selection for the new Montlake Library. She said that, of the sites on the MCC committee's list, those preferred by the Seattle Public Library's board are the Museum of History and Industry (MOHAI), Montlake Professional Building, and the northeast or northwest corners of the intersection of East McGraw St. and 24th Avenue E. She added that there had been little public comment on the sites and, with one exception, little response from the potentially affected property owners. After some discussion on how best to solicit community opinion while there was still time to influence a decision, President Easton decided to put the issue on the September general meeting agenda, condi­tional on obtaining a Library representative to speak.

The evening's final subject was how to increase participation by community members in the activities of the club. President Easton introduced the subject by saying that she had received a suggestion that having a potluck supper prior to the general meeting might increase interest and attendance. The discussion which followed included suggestions for programs, expanded use of email for communication and other ideas. The opinion was also expressed that the primary business of the club is always going to be pretty dull, and that interest always has and will increase when important issues arise.

The next meeting of the board was scheduled for September 6 at the Gibson residence.  The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m.

General Meeting Minutes

June 14, 2000 A regular meeting of the Montlake Community Club was called to order at the Montlake Community Center by President Clarissa Easton at 7:30 p.m. on June 14, 2000. The minutes of the May meeting were approved as published.

Paul Gibson, in his introduction of the evening's first speaker, said that the Arboretum Park Preservation Coalition (APPC) had been created partly as a result of the club's resolution opposing much of the original Portico plan for the arboretum. The APPC's strategy to limit change in the current master plan is to obtain Seattle Landmark status for Washington Park, one of Seattle's Olmstead parks. APPC had solicited a donation from MCC to help pay for the preparation of a nomination to landmark status. Karen Gorden, Director Urban Conser­vation Division, Historic Preservation Office, Seattle Department of Neighborhoods, had been asked to explain the landmark designation process and the protections it provides.

She told those assembled that the Landmark Preservation Board has eleven members who are appointed by the mayor and approved by the city council. When a city "resource" (a parcel of land, a structure, or a combination or group of these) is nominated, the board first decides whether it meets the established criteria for landmark status. Instead of elaborating on the criteria, she said that Washington Park would surely qualify. She provided all present a copy of the specifying city ordinance and a handout, which lists the Seattle Historic Preservation World Wide Web home page www.ci.seattle.wa.us/don/ uc/uchome.htm.

From 30 to 60 days after a nomination has been approved, the Preservation Board holds a public meeting to decide what aspects or features of the "resource" should be desig­nated for historic preservation. She emphasized that the property owner is involved in this process and that Land­mark status is not typically applied to an entire property.

If agreement is reached on designation and the board approves, it has up to 75 days to draft a Controls and Incentives document, working with the property owner. As its title implies, the document specifies the limitations to be placed on the designated features, and the incentives to be provided to the owner for complying with these limitations.

The final step is approval by the City Council, but she said that recommendations of the Preservation Board are usually accepted.

In response to questions, she said that gaining landmark designation for a park is more challenging than for a building. Queen Anne Boulevard, Hiawatha Park, Kuboda Gardens and Gasworks Park are four cases where park property has been given landmark status, but the limits placed on change differ in each case. She thought Wash­ington Park was worthy of landmark status, but said that it would not prevent future change to the park.

President Easton introduced the meeting's main speaker, Seattle City Council member Jim Compton, who talked about current issues. He began by commenting that he had toured the playfield and community center prior to the meeting, experiencing the mud first hand. He clearly saw that the facility needed additional support. That said, he emphasized that he wanted a levy created that would be approved by the voters, and that would involve some political judgments as to the amount to request and how to spend it.

Mr. Compton chairs the City Council’s Public Safety Committee, and his talk featured the three major current tasks he oversees as a result of this chairmanship. One of these, selecting a new Chief of Police, had progressed to the interview stage, with seven candidates remaining after the review of resumes. The second task, negotiating a new contract with the Seattle Police Officers Guild, he thought was going well because the Guild had agreed to accept a citizen review board. The third task, an investigation of the city's management of the demonstrations during the World Trade Organization conference, is coming to a close. He said that the objective of the investigation was to determine what went wrong in order to avoid similar prob­lems in the future. Seven staff members with a $200,000 budget and 57 citizen volunteers have been involved.

Asked to comment on parking law enforcement, he men­tioned that it isn't a budget issue, since increased fine revenue more than covers the cost of additional personnel. It is public complaint to members of the City Council that keeps enforcement to its current levels.

In closing, Mr. Compton said that the Arboretum Master Plan is a tough issue, since it involves the competing interest of two groups—the existing park users and the plant scientists. He also listened to several suggestions on solutions to local traffic problems.

Lee Kolb reported on his conversation with Fisheries regarding the possible siting of a cellular telephone anten­na array. He was told that discussions between Fisheries and interested parties were ongoing, but that there were security issues that were difficult to resolve and there was no assurance that an agreement would be reached. If the security hurdle is overcome, Fisheries would have to pub­lish a formal request for bids before they could contract with anyone, and they intend to make some form of com­munity review process part of any contract. They thought it premature to involve the community until they had seen a proposal that dealt successfully with their security con­cerns. Paul Gibson suggested that the club send a letter to Fisheries notifying them of our interest and concerns.

A question was raised as to the status of the proposal for a waterfront trail across Fisheries property connecting the playfield and West Montlake Park. No one present had any firm information, although it was suggested that a relatively recent requirement that all Federal facilities have perimeter fences may have stymied the plan.

Ted Choi moved that the following resolution regarding the Montlake Community Center be adopted:

The Montlake Community Club (MCC) strongly supports inclusion of the Montlake Community Center in the ProParks 2000 levy. The $2,900,000 allocation is to be used to expand activity areas, create multipurpose rooms, office space, storage space and other necessary facilities. MCC urges increased facilities and grounds maintenance at our community center and endorses the $900,000 ball field and grounds maintenance item included in the 2000 COMPLAN. Our community has a long history of supporting civic levy requests. Due to the popularity of our programs and our location (a cross roads community) we draw participants from all over the city. Increased building and grounds maintenance and facilities upgrades are long overdue.

After a second to the motion, he spoke briefly in its sup­port. There were no speakers in opposition and the motion passed.

In closing announcements, Liz Bagshaw encouraged club members to participate in the Montlake Gardens Potluck on July 9, and Joe Marshall reminded those present of the public meeting on the draft environmental impact state­ment for the Arboretum Master Plan on June 15.

The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m.

What’s Happening at Montlake Community Center in 2000?

Montlake has a new Assistant Center Coordinator. She comes to us from a neighboring center with over 10 years of service with Seattle Parks. Anita Adams, for­merly Assistant Center Coordinator at Miller Commu­nity Center, brought a plethora of new ideas and a wealth of experience just in time to kick off a summer full of fun. Montlake has nine camps packed full of laughter, friendship, and fun for participants from ages 3 to 16. Each year our programs grow. This year we launched a large-scale instructor recruitment campaign with the goal to increase class offerings and expand current classes.

At our annual Family Night, Wednesday August 23, we gathered under the theme, "Celebrate You.” Parents enjoyed skits, a made-for-you movie, a No Kid Zone for parents to mingle while listening to Emerald City Jazz ensemble. Children enjoyed the amazing carni­val, sponsored in part by the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation, Montlake Advisory Council, and the Montlake Community Club.

Roger and Anita have also been busy managing our satellite locations, Madison Bathhouse and the nationally noted Japanese Gardens. This year the kite-making festival and celebration will mark the 40th anniversary of the gardens. Several tourists and patrons have called to pre-register for the events, Hundreds will be in attendance. The garden was recently listed in the Seattle P-I as one of the most beautiful gardens in Washington. You may email Anita at anita.adams@ci.seattle.wa.us.

News from the Montlake Advisory Council

By Diane Thompson

Montlake Advisory Council (MAC) is a volunteer group made up of community members acting in an advisory capacity to the Montlake Recreation Center staff. Our objective is to help provide for maximum recreational opportunities and services for the resi­dents of Montlake and other users of center facilities. Our major achievement last spring was getting Mont­lake included in the ProParks 2000 levy, which will be on the November ballot. The MAC is begin­ning a planning process to increase program space at the center. We welcome your ideas and suggestions. New Assistant Center Coordinator Anita Adams and Roger are planning new classes for the 2000-2001 season. Contact us with your ideas, or attend the next meeting. Monthly meetings are the first Monday of each month, 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. Due to the Labor Day holiday, the September meeting is the 2nd Monday, September 11, 7:00 pm in the modular building. The meeting is open to all. Contact Sam Greeley, MAC President, email GreelS@champint.com.

Announcements

Montlake Garden Tour Rescheduled

Once again, we must postpone the date of our neigh­borhood garden tour. This time, it will be for next year: Saturday, June 24, 2001. So far, nine residents have volunteered their gardens and more are certainly welcome. Watch the Flyer for updates next spring. To nominate gardens or simply ask a question about the tour, call Judith at 324-0252, Kari at 329-1911, or Lee at 328-8733.

Notices

Football Parking RPZs

If you live on a street which already has parking re­strictions during Husky football games, then the same parking restrictions will apply during Seahawks games. You need not take any action.

If, however, you live south of Boyer, your street may not be part of a restricted "residential parking zone" (RPZ) for the games. If you would like to implement such a restriction you can contact the City at any time. You will need a form and the signatures of 60% of the residents on the street. The Seahawks will help with the legwork. For information, email Montlake's representative to the Husky Stadium Advisory Com­mittee, Bruce Balick at balick@sprynet.com.

If you aren't sure if your block has an RPZ, go out­side and see if there are signs announcing parking restrictions for last year's football games, or check the at http://clerk.ci.seattle.wa.us/~ordpics/112978d.gif for a map.

CUCAC Meeting Report

The agenda for the August 8, 2000 meeting of the University Community Advisory Committee (CUCAC) included a number of issues of immediate concern to Montlake residents.

In the May Flyer we reported on a proposed "Ambu­latory Care Pavilion" attached to the east end of University Hospital. A draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) has been released for this building. Comments are due September 14, 2000. Montlakers should review this and comment. I have copies if anyone wishes one.

The University's Golf Driving Range at the corner of 45th Avenue and Montlake Boulevard is up for reno­vation (after 35 years, we are told). Same lot cover­age, but plans are for a double-deck, covered-tee line to handle 72 tees, an increase in the mesh fence height from 37 feet to 100 feet, better lights and 15 more parking spaces for golfers. A stated reason: safety of folks on 45th!

We expect that the University planning people will mail CUCAC members the draft Master Plan about September 25 for discussion at the October 10 meeting. Final comments will be due on Nov 29. This 10-year development plan for the "University of the Future" has been in preparation for over a year and should be carefully reviewed by Montlake residents. I suggest that interested persons try to get some advance information on the Campus Master Plan website, www.washington.edu/community/cmp. The site will take comments.

Of equal importance to Montlakers is the issue of lease limits related to University activities in the greater University of Washington area. A 1998 agreement between the City and the University put a limit on the amount of leased space that the University may occupy off campus. University officials and various community leaders are discussing adjustments to the limits. We don't know who will benefit from changes. These limits do have a Montlake impact. Watch for further news on the subject.

NEDC Meeting Report

By Paul Gibson

In the summer of 2000 the NEDC carried on its wonky ways. One important activity was to prioritize about a dozen proposals for local utilization of some City money that is available for projects suggested by neighborhood groups or individual citizens. The Neighborhood Street Fund and the Cumulative Reserve Fund can be spent on streets and sidewalk projects and maintenance of City-owned facilities such as parks. There were no proposals from Montlake, but anyone with an idea of a need in these areas should become acquainted with the process by which these funds are allocated, in order to make a timely application next year.

The NEDC also adopted formal positions emphasizing:

·        The importance of noise mitigation on any SR-520 development.

·        The need to address noise pollution in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.

·        Support for the underground alignment of the light rail link from the University District to Northgate.

We had a lively discussion of the University’s proposal to expand their capacity to lease off-campus space, putting the University on notice that the neighboring communities expect to be actively involved in any revision of the current limitation.

The NEDC is composed of representatives from the MCC, Portage Bay/Roanoke C.C. and various organizations (mostly community councils) north of the canal to NE 95th Street and between I-5 and Lake Washington. It is one of 12 District Councils that send representatives to the City Neighborhood Council. Responsibilities of the CNC include review and recom­mendations regarding City budget issues, including especially the Neighborhood Matching Fund and the Neighborhood Street Fund. The system of district and citywide councils provides a formal structure for neighborhood organizations to influence City policies. Questions? Call 323-1851.

SEAHAWKS-HUSKY FOOTBALL CONGESTION UPDATE

Bruce Balick serves on the Husky Stadium Advisory Group, which met on July 27 to consider implementation of the City-Seahawks agreements on traffic, safety, and other issues related to the use of Husky Stadium. This is a summary of the first of three or four meetings that will take place through December.

There are two separate though similar agreements for controlling traffic and safety on game days: an old one for Husky games; and a newer, more stringent one for Seahawks games. Montlakers are used to the problems and remedies for Husky games. These will not change. However, there are a few important wrinkles for the Seahawks games. Note that the Seahawks will cover all costs of law enforcement, information mailings, and mitigation measures when they play at Husky Stadium.

First and foremost on everyone's mind is emergency access to our homes. Police and fire officials assure us that because each major intersection is staffed by a police officer, emergency vehicles can get to homes and businesses faster on game days than at any other times. The longest access time is 4 minutes.

What about traffic and parking? The Seahawks have an aggressive program to encourage bus and HOV parking through preferential access and reduced fees. This means many more busses, but fewer cars on Seahawk game days. Also, the City is limiting attendance to 71,000 fans—less than the stadium's capacity—and it has required that there be no more than 195 cars per 1,000 attendees, or new rules will kick in. So traffic should be a bit lighter than normal whenever the Seahawks invade Montlake.

Two extra police are being added to the RPZ enforcement squad south of Montlake Bridge for all Seahawks games. If this isn't adequate, more will be assigned. The Sea­hawks are paying a private firm to collect trash from lawns and gardens after each game as soon as daylight permits. The streets on which trash will be collected are still being negotiated. Vendors for Seahawks games will be asked to locate on UW grounds rather than sidewalks near Montlake Bridge. Parking on City-owned parks, including the Playfield, will be patrolled. Please report problems to the Hotline.

The Seahawks will play 12 games a year at Husky Stad­ium, including preseason games, plus any playoffs. U.W. is being paid generously for the Stadium. We gain only more problems, hopefully tolerable. Don't expect miracles, and do expect to be annoyed. For what its worth, we'll be working hard to enforce the provisions of the agreement, and with your help we'll set a higher standard for a new long-term contract with the Huskies.

First Game Report

The first Seahawk game occurred on August 5. The Montlake Flyer deadline was shortly afterwards, so there is only limited and anecdotal feedback to report. Traffic seemed light compared to Husky games, but that's probab­ly because attendance at preseason games is always low. Police were at their stations before and after the game. RPZ enforcement was a major problem: at half time on one street near Husky Stadium there were 34 parked cars, 20 of those without RPZ permits, and only one with a citation. (A similar problem was reported in Laurel­hurst.) Trash on the streets was light. Police overzealously enforced prohibition of a resident's parking-for-fee in his driveway, claiming that's what the neighborhood officially requested (not true!). A neighbor's car was stolen at the end of the game. It had been moved from their driveway to the street in order to make room for a friend's car.

Enforcement Phone Numbers

Emergency:                           911

Police non-emergency:         625-5011

Non-police HOTLINE        800-981-6465 touchtone

(information, complaints &     938-0468 live operator

comments about anything)

You should expect fast response from 911. Other opera­tors will explain what response you can expect when you call. Operators at the HOTLINE will be trained to contact appropriate City enforcement agencies. They will route your calls for you and report all problems and suggestions to the Husky Stadium Advisory Group in summary form for further action.