Text Box: The Montlake Flyer
			 A Newsletter for the Entire Montlake Community
Volume 36, Number 2																		      February 2002
The times they are achanging
MCC to meet at 7:00pm

Beginning with the February 2002 meetings, both the Montlake Community Club Board of Trustees and the Montlake Community Club General Membership will meet one-half hour earlier than their accustomed times. Both meetings will henceforth begin at 7:00pm. The change in times is necessitated by a reduction in the operating hours at Montlake Community Center. Community Center hours have been result as a result of budget cuts at the Parks Department.

The Board Meeting will be held Wednesday, February 6, at 7:00pm in the modular building west of the Tudor building. The board will be updated by Sound Transit planners. The public is welcome.

The General Meeting will be held Wednesday, February 13, at 7:00pm in the Tudor building. The new Seattle Public Library staff will be introduced and we will be briefed on the status of the new Montlake Branch Library.

Text Box: I	The Montlake Informant . . . . . . . . . . . . . 	2
n	Nine for Neighbor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 	3
s	Montlake Branch Library . . . . . . . . . . . . 	4
i	Notices and Announcements . . . . . . . . . 	5
d	Community Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . 	5
e	Transportation Committee Report . . . . 	6
	NEDC Meeting Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 	7
	General Meeting Minutes, Classifieds	8
	Commercial Advertising . . . . . . . . . . . . . 	9
	CAlso visit your Montlake community
    website at montlake.net.

Architect Selection Process Begins
For design of new Montlake branch

The advertisement seeking the architects and engineers for four branch libraries, including Montlake, will be published in the Daily Journal of Commerce on January 24 and February 7. The same advertisement also will be posted on the Seattle Public Library’s Web site.

The interview and selection process is scheduled to begin sometime in the spring and conclude during the summer.

The new branch manager, Miriam Driss, and the new project manager, Justine Kim, are very enthusiastic about meeting community members and starting to work with them through the first phase of this project, the architect selection process. They will both attend the February MCC meeting to introduce themselves and explain the community involvement opportunities in further detail.

The new Montlake Library is part of the $196.4 million “Libraries for All” building program that Seattle voters approved in 1998. For complete information on “Libraries for All”, and details on the Montlake branch project, visit the Library’s Web site at www.spl.org. The Library encourages comments and suggestions by email to capital.program@spl.org; by fax to 386-4108; and to project manager Justine Kim at 615-1329 and branch manager Miriam Driss at 684-4720.


Interlaken Blvd plank road across 26th E, Jan. 4,1913. Seattle Municipal archives, Frank H. Nowell, Parks History Collection

Text Box: The Montlake Flyer is published monthly, except for July and August, by the Montlake Community Club. With a circulation of 1,200, the Flyer is delivered free by volunteers to all Montlake residents and businesses. Nonresidents may purchase yearly subscriptions, delivered by US Mail. 
We welcome your ideas, comments and submittals. 
Deadline for the March issue is Friday, February 15.
Editor: Jeff Wood
Advertising: Jennifer Emrich
Delivery: Jeannine Jacobson
Subscriptions: Bill Weitkamp
Printing: Ptarmigan Press
School Selection Confusion?

Claudia Allan informs the Flyer that area parents who select Montlake as their first choice for incoming students, and who don’t make the cut, do NOT lessen their chances of being assigned to their second choice school. Exact language from a School District document reads: “If a student is not assigned to a first choice school, the subsequent choices are considered and weighed against tiebreaker priorities of other students selecting the school as a higher choice.” And those tiebreaker priorities, in order, are: Sibling; Reference Area; Integration Positive; Distance; Lottery. Questions? Call 720-3533.

The Montlake Informant

Text Box:   Sean Schmidt's body runs the track while his mind focuses on his goal of making the 2004 Olympics as a Modern Pentathlete.

Let’s keep those cards and letters rolling in, people…The Flyer is delivered to 1,200 households thru wind, rain, sleet, rain, hail, rain, etc., and we’ve only received six or seven entries for the neighborhood slogan contest! True, those entries are brilliant, but hey, come on. See email address below….Somebody give that man a cape…We’re going to check with Jonathan Dubman on this, but rumors of a cross-Cut ferry route to run between Foster Island and Husky Stadium appear to be baseless. Might speed things up, though. If you see a guy riding a buzzing, high-tech bicycle that seems unusually quick, that’s JD himself, Montlake’s resident transportation-issue superhero. So flag him down for a (quick and buzzing) briefing. The guy is awesome …Give it up for the Talking Man!…You’ve seen him around. About 5’ 11”, black hair, backpack, colorfully dressed, talking loudly. Anybody know anything about this ubiquitous Montlaker? Inquiring minds want to know….The Montlake Informant Submissions Dept. Report…Celebrity sightings: None. Cute personalized license plates: None. Let’s keep it that way, folks! All other appropriate submissions welcome, esp. those dealing with crows, but the Informant reserves the right to file circularly or forward to the editor….Say, speaking of crows…did we mention that John Withey, well-known Corvus brachyrhynchos scholar, once spent a morning counting how many of our dark and raucous friends left the Foster Island rookery on appointed rounds?  9,000 that day….Draw lightbulb over head…So, let’s see, if there are 1,200 households in Montlake, and we’ll say 2.5 persons per, then our slogan could be: “Montlake – Three crows for every human!” Damn, that’s good. Right? Don’t delay…Send your submissions (gift certificates, trial balloons, rare stamps) to informant@montlake.net.

Nine for a Neighbor

This month we continue our column in which we introduce a real, living and breathing fellow Montlaker through the posing of Nine Questions. Our guest this month is Sean Schmidt, a Steilacoom, Washington native who has been a Boyer Avenue resident for the past seven years. A few years after graduating from the UW with Psychology and Environmental Studies degrees, Sean bought the Montlake home he currently shares with two roommates. He works for the Nordstrom Corporate office as the Sustainable Business and Development Coordinator, a position in which he coordinates many of the company’s social and environmental affairs. Sean has recently taken over a Montlake Flyer delivery route, so if you see him approaching your house at a rapid pace with the Flyer in one hand and a small caliber pistol in the other, no need to assume that you’re under attack (or that he’ll force you to read the Flyer from cover to cover at gunpoint). No worries, Mate. Sean is in training for the Modern Pentathlon in the 2004 Olympics to be held in Athens, Greece.

1. SD:  What is the Modern Day Pentathlon?

SS: Like the marathon, Modern Pentathlon has a story. In the Ancient Games, the pentathlon was the pinnacle event, even over decathlon since the variety of sports (wrestling, javelin, discuss, running and long jump) was considered a true test of the warrior-athlete. When Baron Pierre de Coubertin revived the Games, he formed a “modern pentathlon” from the major athletic disciplines of the modern Olympics that told a story of the strength, speed, skill and strategy of a Napoleonic courier taking a message off the battlefield. Thus, the “modern pentathlon” consists of shooting (10m air pistol), fencing (one minute, one-touch bouts against all competitors), swimming (200m freestyle), horsejumping (stadium course on an unfamiliar horse) and running (a 3k, cross-country handicap run based on your points from the first four events).

2. SD: Break down a typical day in your life, sunrise to sundown, including your personal, professional and training responsibilities.

SS: I generally do two or three practices a day. I start with a swim in the morning at the Meredith Mathews YMCA, go off to a full day of work at work and then do a run in the late afternoon followed by one other sport in the evenings. I fence at Salle Auriol in downtown Seattle and take lessons at Rain City Fencing in Bellevue. I do my horsejumping at Hilltop Stables in Woodinville. For shooting I either go to Kenmore Ranges or Wade’s Range in Bellevue. Amazingly, on weekends I can sometimes fit in practices for all five sports.

3. SD:  What separates you from all other pentathlon athletes with Olympic aspirations?

SS: Most pentathletes come from a competitive swimming and/or running background. My background is rowing so even though I’ve dabbled in the individual pentathlon sports in the past, I had never competed in any of them prior to this adventure.

4. SD:  In your mind, how big is a bread box ?

SS: 10” high x 10” wide x 20” long.

5. SD:  Name a hero or someone you admire who is of a party or political mindset with which you don’t typically agree.

SS: Bill Ruckelshaus who served as EPA Administrator under Nixon and Reagan. He’s a Republican, I’m a Democrat, but his leadership on issues of sustainability has always really impressed me.

6. SD:  Who should play your father in a made-for-for-TV movie about your life ?

SS: Sean Connery, because he looks just like my dad.

7. SD:   If men are from Mars and women are from Venus, where do babies come from?

SS: Someplace much more neutral.

8. SD:   Name a Pentathlon event in which you would prefer not to include an audience and one in which you would prefer an audience (and why in both cases?)

SS: No audience for the horsejumping because when you mess up, its no fun for you but very entertaining for the audience. Audience for the running. Its generally the last event, so its always great to have a lot of people cheering you on.

9. SD:   Name an athlete (living or dead) for whom you have the most respect.

SS: Sally Ride. I’m a firm believer in developing one’s mind, body and spirit to its fullest extent, whatever that may be. Besides being the first woman in space, Sally Ride is an athlete (she was going to be a professional tennis player at one time), a professor at UCSD and writes children’s books. She’s a business woman and volunteers in the community. She does it all.

SD: Thanks Sean and good luck!! You can find out more about Sean and other northwest pentathletes at www.nwmpa.org.

Have a neighbor you’d like us to interview? Email your suggestion to shanedoran@attbi.com.

Montlake Library Increases Hours

The Montlake Library, 2300 24th Avenue East, will be open 58½ hours a week, starting Wednesday, January 2, 2002. The library’s new hours will be—

Monday to Thursday: 10:00am to 9:00pm
Friday:
11:30am to 6:00pm
Saturday:
10:00am to 6:00pm
Sunday: Closed

The library added 12 open hours a week to help patrons who previously used the Henry Library, 425 Harvard Avenue East. The Henry Library closed Saturday, November 3, 2001, so construction could begin on an exciting new library planned on the site.

”The new Capitol Hill Library will be wonderful, but we recognize that Henry patrons will need to use other branches until it opens,” said Deborah L. Jacobs, city librarian. “We’re committed to giving the public superior service. Increasing the hours at Montlake is another example of that commitment.”

Henry patrons also can use the nearby Temporary Central Library, 800 Pike Street. The Washington State Convention and Trade Center’s two garages offer short-term parking at discounted rates for people using the Temporary Central Library. Library patrons can park for up to two hours for only $1 an hour under the program.

Construction began in December on the new $4.8 million Capitol Hill Library, which will feature a capacity for 40,200 books and materials, more seats, a meeting room, a 400-square-foot neighborhood service center and parking. The 11,900-square-foot library was designed by Johnston Architects and Cutler Architects. The contractor is Summit Central Construction Inc.

The new library is part of the $196.4 million “Libraries for All” bond measure that Seattle voters passed in 1998. The plan calls for improving or replacing all 22 branch libraries, building five new branches and building a new central library.

The Seattle Public Library Foundation is in the midst of a “Campaign for Seattle’s Public Libraries” with the goal of raising $75 million from private sources to enhance the public bond commitment. Every dollar raised will ensure the library system reflects our community’s needs in buildings, books, technology and people, long into the future. For more information about “Libraries for All” or the Foundation, visit www.spl.org. For more information, call Caroline Young Ullmann, communications assistant, at 206-615-1627.

More Library Updates

The Montlake Library has a new Branch Manager, Miriam Driss, who will be splitting her time between the Montlake and Madrona branches. She can be reached at miriam.driss@spl.org.

Various other staff have been added, some from the Henry Library, to cover the longer hours and increased patronage in light of the temporary closing of the Henry branch. Lynn Lorenz joins the new staff as the Childrens’ Librarian, with hours on Monday evenings and varying hours on Tuesdays.

The staff is particularly excited about the introduction of story times for preschoolers. These will be held at 10:30am, Tuesday mornings beginning February 12. Stop by to meet these enthusiastic new additions to our community!

Justine Kim is now the Library’s Project Architect for the new Montlake Library, replacing Sue Partridge (and Alex Harris in the interim) who resigned for health reasons last year. She can be reached at justine.kim@spl.org.

The architect selection process for the various new libraries, including Montlake, will begin later this month. Justine will be coordinating this, and is writing an article for the February issue of The Montlake Flyer. Updates on the new programs and staff at the Montlake Library are intended to be included in the February or March issues of The Montlake Flyer.

Both Miriam and Justine will be attending the February MCC general meeting to discuss these developments.

All very exciting!

NOTICES & ANNOUNCEMENTS

Preschool Storytimes at the Montlake Library

Tuesdays at 10:30 am, beginning February 12, join children’s Librarian Lynn Lorenz to hear great stories and to participate in fun activities. If you have any questions, please call the library at 684-4720

Neighborhood Appreciation Day

On Saturday February 9, 2002, Montlake Community Center is hosting a Neighborhood Appreciation Day. Join us in the Tudor building for our Winter Program Workshop from 1:00 to 5:00pm. There will be food and opportunities to try out some of Montlake’s Winter classes. Representatives from our classes such as Hip Hop, Pottery, Karate, and Yoga will be present. Come and see what we’re doing at Montlake and try out a new activity for fun! Or just come and munch on some food and see your neighbors! Montlake Community Center is located at 1618 E. Calhoun. Call 684-4736 for information.

Interlaken Park Work Party

Dear Friends of Interlaken Park, please welcome Kari Olson as the new volunteer coordinator for Friends of Interlaken Park. Kari lives in the Montlake neighborhood and has many years of experience in landscape restoration. Her backyard is a designated wildlife sanctuary and abuts the north side of Interlaken Park. We’re delighted to have her expertise and organizational skills to help us with restoring Interlaken’s native forest. I will continue to participate in work parties, and take the lead on working with Earthcorps (our contractor) on a soil amendment and planting project this winter.

Come Visit Us Online
at montlake.net

Be sure and visit your community home page on the Web, http://montlake.net, which I dare say is one of Seattle’s best neighborhood web sites, just as the Flyer you have in your hand is among the best in its class. The web site has been slightly redesigned with direct and easy access to the latest Flyer, online forum, and new community calendar. There are archives of Montlake Flyers for the past two years, historical articles and photographs, a new aerial view of the neighborhood, and all sorts of useful regional links, with even more new content coming soon.


Click on the “Forum” button to join our neighborhood mailing list or browse the archives. The online Forum provides a way to disseminate important information on short notice when there isn’t adequate lead time to get it into the Flyer. It also is a good way to participate in discussing important community issues especially for the many who don’t have time to show up for all these meetings. Just click on the bright red button marked “Forum” on the home page and you’re there. Jonathan Dubman, webmaster, Montlake.net


MCC Letter to Trans-Lake Project

To:          Members of the Trans Lake Washington Advisory Committee, and supporting staff members

From:      Jean Leed, Seattle Representative for Montlake

Date:       January 6, 2002

Due to business travel out of town, I am unable to attend our final meeting on January 9 and am therefore conveying my thoughts and recommendations by letter. It is my understanding that the questions we will be asked to comment on are the same ones developed for the Technical Committee at its final meeting on December 12, 2001, so responses to them compose the bulk of my letter.

I have served as the Montlake liaison to the Trans Lake Committee since June 1997. I joined because I believe this is our region’s last chance for significant changes in the SR 520 corridor (which passes directly through the Montlake neighborhood), and I want to encourage a long-term view. We won’t have another chance for significant change in the corridor during our lifetimes.

Based on the resolutions passed by the Community Club and the comments I have received from Montlake community members during that period, I can attest that there is a high level of support here for developing other modes of travel in the SR 520 corridor besides single occupancy vehicles (SOV’s). Most residents favor reducing dependence on cars, while recognizing that the long-term economic vitality and mobility in this region require public investment in alternative modes of travel: transit, buses, carpooling, bike paths, pedestrian paths, etc.

We are equally concerned that any such changes preserve (and even improve) the quality of life we value: enhancing safety and reliability, reducing noise and air pollution, preserving environmentally sensitive areas, and reunifying communities (such as our own) which are bifurcated by busy freeways and arterials. Thus, here are my comments on the options under consideration for the next phase of the Trans Lake Study.

Transportation Demand Management (TDM): Reducing demand for roads (through both incentives and penalties) is in the long run the cheapest and most effective way to address our transportation needs. The EIS should examine the impact of aggressive Transportation Demand Management, and also Transportation System Management to make travel safer, more reliable, and shorter.

High Capacity Transit (HCT) options:

·    HOV/Bus Rapid Transit lanes: Dedicated bus and HOV lanes are the next most cost-effective way to move large numbers of people throughout the region. Currently SR 520 and sections of I-5 through Seattle are the only two major throughways without continuous dedicated HOV lanes. However, it is essential that such lanes cannot be converted to general purpose lanes in response to political pressure (cf. current efforts to strip I-90 of its dedicated transit lanes). Buses also will congest Seattle arterials once they exit the freeways. I am therefore doubtful that Bus Rapid Transit is a long-term “solution”, but it can help in the immediate future.

·    Fixed guideway transit on the 520 corridor or on I-90? I-90 still seems the better corridor for rail transit through about 2020 (if that right-of-way can be preserved for transit). By then, however, transit will be needed and viable on both corridors. I am therefore concerned that the upcoming EIS take into consideration the need to preserve right-of-way for future transit (probably exiting from the 520 corridor before it reaches Montlake and going toward the University District).

How many lanes of traffic on SR 520? The current four-lane configuration would have the least impact on the Montlake area. In any case, there should be no more than six road lanes on SR 520, two of which should be dedicated to HOV/bus travel. Any roadway larger than this through residential areas on both sides of the lake would require more land than is available and would do irreparable damage to wetlands and other sensitive areas. It would also increase noise, air pollution, and traffic on streets and arterials beyond the level they can sustain.

Lids: Lidding could provide mitigation for past and potential future impacts of SR 520 in Montlake. There should be further exploration of the possibilities and advantages of lidding in the land-based areas of the corridor. The lids should be short enough not to require ventilation tubes, and long enough to allow for reconnecting neighborhoods through amenities like parks and safe open space.

In sum, these criteria suggest that Options 1 (no change), 2 (four GP lanes, plus bike/ped access), and 3 (four GP and two HOV lanes, plus bike/ped access) should be carried forward in the EIS. Option 7 (adding an HOV/BRT lane and connections to the current four GP lanes) also deserves further study, but only if it could be done within the existing right-of-way. While fixed guideway in the SR 520 corridor (as contemplated in Option 5) is not needed now (assuming transit is built on I-90), I encourage further exploration of providing for the future right-of-way, so that decisions made now do not preclude that possibility later.

The Montlake Community Club has voted against further study of a second crossing of the Montlake Cut, due primarily to environmental concerns and other impacts on local residents. MCC also supports confining any new facility to the existing right-of-way. Traffic impacts on Montlake Boulevard are already beyond capacity, due largely to traffic bound for or exiting from SR 520. Therefore we urge further exploration in the EIS of every possible way to contain and/or mitigate any increase of vehicles on Montlake Boulevard due to changes in the SR 520 corridor.

The Montlake community remains deeply interested in the Trans Lake process and will continue to be highly involved throughout the EIS process and beyond, since any changes in the SR 520 corridor will inevitably impact our community. We do want to thank the TLW consultants for meeting with our community on several occasions to discuss our concerns, and hope for continued cooperation.

MCC TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Meeting report

Next meeting: Wednesday, Feb. 20 at 7:30pm, west modular building, Montlake community center. This is not a formal committee but more of a round table discussion, and all are most welcome.

The Trans-Lake Washington Project, which hopes to have settled on a set of alternatives for further study by Jan. 30, plans to send representatives to the general meeting of the club on Feb. 13. They will discuss ramp metering, next steps, the EIS process, and upcoming community workshops in the February-March timeframe, which are expected to focus on interchange options.

Many in the neighborhood have been actively lobbying members of the Trans-Lake Executive Committee with the following objectives: (1) to drop the 8 lane alternatives from further consideration, (2) to study an alternative that adds HOV lanes but does not include a tunnel under (or bridge over) the Montlake cut, and (3) to stay as close as possible to the existing right of way. At the most recent Transportation Committee meeting on Jan. 16, several people asked what is objectionable about the notion of this tunnel, which at first glance might be a good way to solve some the congestion problems on the Montlake Bridge. One key concern about a tunnel under the Montlake cut near where MOHAI stands today has been the fact that the freeway would possibly have to be raised by as much as 24 feet above its current level in that vicinity in order for this tunnel to fit underneath. Everything in the tunnel’s path, from the MOHAI parking lot through where the totem pole stands today, to the tall trees on the far side of the cut, would have to be dug up and reconstructed. Another, less-favored alternative, a fixed bridge across the Montlake cut basically obliterating Marsh Island, would have to be as high as the West Seattle Bridge. Montlakers have not been arguing that the tunnel should not be studied, but many feel it is important that the project study at least one alternative for adding HOV lanes to SR-520 that does not include a “second crossing” of the Montlake cut. Meetings were scheduled with a number of city councilmembers and other officials, whom we are hoping will speak out in favor of this reasonable and constructive stance. See the online Montlake Forum for the latest developments in this area.

Sound Transit is currently studying ways to extend the planned Link light rail system from downtown through the University District to Northgate. (For a link to the scoping report about this, see the Montlake.net home page.) The Sound Transit board will select a set of alternatives for further study on February 14. One of the leading candidates is a bored tunnel under Capitol Hill and Montlake, with an underground station in the vicinity of the Triangle Parking Garage on the UW campus. This “South Campus” station would directly serve Husky Stadium and the medical center, and would be within walking distance to SR-520 and Montlake. In contrast with the “cut and cover” tunnel proposed by Trans-Lake, Sound Transit is only considering a bored tunnel under Montlake which is not expected to require any surface disruption except at the station location on campus. The EIS will study any environmental effects there may be, as well as the cost-effectiveness of this route versus other potential tunnels or bridges closer to I-5.

The project, headed by Ron Endlich, is interested in establishing a constructive dialogue with Montlake. The project will send representatives to the MCC Board meeting in the west modular building at the Montlake Community Center on Feb. 6 at 7:30pm. Those who are interested in learning more about this project are encouraged to attend. Sound Transit will return for the general meetings and transportation committee meetings as appropriate later on.

On a more mundane, but no less important note, I have heard from many Montlake residents who are concerned about pedestrian safety and traffic speeding through the neighborhood. There are some city resources available to deal with this issue, though not a lot. I will be focusing on speeding and safety more intently in the near future. The least we can do for now is to set a good example for all by obeying our own speed limits. The speed limit is only 30 mph on 23rd Avenue but traffic is regularly doing over 35-40 mph and sometimes much more. Please also pay attention to your speeds on Lynn and Boyer, watch for bicyclists and remember we have many young children, a very popular playfield and community center, and an elementary school in our neighborhood.

NEDC Meeting Report

January 2002: The Northeast District Council heard a presentation on the expansion of the Northeast (Wedgewood) Branch of the Seattle public Library.  The branch is expected to close in the 4th quarter of this year and reopen in the 3rd quarter of 2003.

The NEDC decided to support an appeal by the Wedgewood community to restrain as much as possible the playfield lighting for new facilities at Sand Point Magnuson Park.